The panel format allows for a brief introduction and then discussion among the panelists and audience. investment. With but minor exceptions, the panel discussion is here reproduced verbatim. According to Tyson, bilateral approaches are justified as a kind of wrench shifting: You either get more competition in the best of all possible worlds, or you at least get some shifting from foreign to U.S. producers. This new paradigm, she argued, has changed the nature of global competition not only because price is less important, but also because systems are competing and some are more ''innovation friendly" than others. Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves. Evidence and risk stratification for prevention of sudden cardiac death . Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website. Tyson asked the rhetorical question, Can the United States rest assured that the old policies used in many years past will work in this new context? Authors; Authors and affiliations; John Buckmaster; Thomas L. Jackson; Ajay Kumar; Chapter. Panel discussion and summary - Who should receive the wearable cardioverter defibrillator? Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email. Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Not affiliated Tweet. Download preview PDF. TECHNOLOGICAL AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE, 4. If the majority of the panel agenda is centered around presenting information, then just give each panelist a speaking slot with a Q&A after each speaker. Ready to take your reading offline? How can we better manage our own and our team’s resilience – Panel Discussion Summary Share. Sylvia Ostry made a persuasive case for new approaches by focusing on what she called a new innovation paradigm of continuous process and product improvements. The United States could use a stricter approach to antidumping (with tougher penalties when predatory intent can be proved) and a countervailing subsidy approach that would provide direct benefits to U.S. producers. Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text. Europe and Japan have embraced industrial and technology policies, while the United States has been reluctant. Sign up for email notifications and we'll let you know about new publications in your areas of interest when they're released. Not logged in TECHNOLOGY AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMPETITION--HISTORICAL TRENDS, 3. Unable to display preview. Can governments devise policies that help to create comparative advantages for national firms? To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter. 244 Downloads; Part of the ICASE/LaRC Interdisciplinary Series in Science and Engineering book series (ICAS, volume 1) Abstract. Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name. Clyde Prestowitz went a step further to suggest that the United States manages trade "de facto" because our industrial policies do not work. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994, Department of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering, Institute of Computer Applications in Science and Engineering (ICASE), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1050-1_22, ICASE/LaRC Interdisciplinary Series in Science and Engineering. Derian reminded the audience that there is no one recipe for a successful technology policy—the right mix depends on the traditions and structural features of the system. 37.187.108.238, Priorities and Objectives for 21st Century. © 2020 National Academy of Sciences. This service is more advanced with JavaScript available, Combustion in High-Speed Flows Unable to display preview. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. Ostry provided a counterpoint in arguing for new international rules of the game. Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips. Nevertheless, the essential meaning of the speakers is clear. LINKING TRADE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES: THEMES AND ISSUES, 2. Panel Discussion Summary. Suggesting the need to work with both bilateral and multilateral trade agreements that are sectorally oriented, he called on the United States to do a better job with sectorally oriented policies. It explores current trends in trade and technology policies and the consequences for U.S. economic competitiveness. Jean-Claude Derian's reflections on the "second battle of Poitiers" (the French response to a flood of Japanese-made VCRs) underscored the fact that there are very different approaches to government-business relations in Europe, the United States, and Japan. Other panelists were Jean-Claude Derian, Sylvia Ostry, and Clyde Prestowitz, Jr. needed rules of global competition in the face of the new innovation paradigm. These new rules must take into account the fact that systems are structured differently; they must be written to work toward a "mutual balance of benefits" in the face of asymmetries in access to technology and. This is a preview of subscription content, © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994, Frontiers of Space And Ground-Based Astronomy, RIKEN Institute of Physical and Chemical Researach, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0794-5_61. A set of presentations, one after another. Summary of Panel Discussion New approaches to linking trade and technology policy were a major theme in the presentations and in the discussions that followed. New approaches to linking trade and technology policy were a major theme in the presentations and in the discussions that followed. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. Ostry called for a new supranational authority—not just a simple focus on harmonization of national rules. Cite as. 7. pp 543-548 | Not a MyNAP member yet? Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips. All rights reserved. Panel Discussion — Summary.